theefool
Members-
Content count
351 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Never
Everything posted by theefool
-
Actually, my pet has had one longer than I have.
-
No thankyou. I've had mine for quite some time.
-
Well, the last linux I tried was mandrake. Not bad, far easier than getting soraris or HPux to work. Note, the last time I used Solaris and HPux was in 1999. Actually, Solaris was 1999 and HPux was back in 1997.
-
Also, have you tried, disconnecting the primary laptop, and seeing if the 2ndary machine can obtain an IP? If that works, your ISP is only giving out one IP.
-
If I understand correctly, you have a dsl modem that goes to a switch that goes to two different computers. One computer connects fine, but the other one doesn't. Are you sharing the internet connection from the primary computer? Is your ISP sending you two seperate IPs? Most ISPs only give out one IP, unless you paid for two of them.
-
linux, linux, linux....in the end, most people look and see how easy it is. But, in reality, linux is much harder to understand then mere winblows.....
-
driverguide.com doesn't help?
-
The hard part is that not everything in those logs are considered bad. I already have at home a batch file that does exactly the same as findit, except it is a bit more friendly. Also, it autocreates a batch file that needs to be run to fix these issues. But, it still needs some work. Like some error level checks. I've been writing batch files for about 10 years. My favourite ones were when ansi.sys was popular......
-
What sp (service pack?) do you have?
-
Okay. This might be a pain, but go into safe mode. bring up a command prompt. Also, I prefer going into the Recovery Console. go to the c:\windows directory by typing in: cd\windows then type in attrib -r -h -s -a jmhhv.dll attrib -r -h -s -a unadbeh.exe erase jmhhv.dll erase unadbeh.exe cd system32 attrib -r -h -s -a adppq.dll attrib -r -h -s -a tshhbbr.dll attrib -r -h -s -a winup2~1.dll attrib -r -h -s -a bdrrqqm.exe attrib -r -h -s -a vimmll.exe attrib -r -h -s -a wmconfig.cpl erase adppq.dll erase tshhbbr.dll erase winup2~1.dll erase bdrrqqm.exe erase vimmll.exe erase wmconfig.cpl cd\docume~1\alluse~1\starm~1\programs\startup attrib -r -h -s -a nrpp.exe erase nrpp.exe exit then click start, run, regedit now migrate to HKEY_CLASSES_ROOT\*\shellex\ContextMenuHandlers\fmttkkxk delete the key fmttkkxx now migrate to HKLM\Software\Microsoft\Active Setup\Installed Components\ delete the key "6cb1abe1-2bcc-47a0-8a90-2ac368f47d8b\(Default) reboot back into normal mode, and give me your logs again. If you have any questions before doing any of this, feel free to ask them. Your problem is from the qoologic trojan downloader. Avast can find it, but not get rid of it. Norton can't find it, mcafee can't find it, adaware doesn't do anything, spybot nothing, MS antispyware doesn't fix it. This roundabout way is the only way I know how to fix this. Though, I'm presently (unless someone beats me to it) making a program that is a bit more optimized.
-
Also, download and post the log of this program too. http://forums.net-integration.net/index.php?act=Attach&type=post&id=134981
-
http://www.majorgeeks.com/download.php?det=4465 download this and run in safe mode Also, download the following: http://lineofire.geekstogo.com/FindIt%20NT-2K-XP.zip # Unzip the contents of FindIt NT-2K-XP.zip to a convenient location. # Navigate to the FindIt NT-2K-XP directory. # Double-click on FindVX2.bat and wait for it to run. # It should open a Notepad window with the FindVX2 log. # Post the contents of FindVX2.txt into your next post. This is a nice batch file. I've used it a couple times. In fact I already have an improved version of this, that I did on my own.
-
It is probably a hidden file. Bring up my computer, select Tools, Folder options, view tab, click the radial button on "Show hidden files and folders". Also, uncheck "Hide protected operating system files". Select yes, on the warning, hit okay. Search for that file again.
-
Well, create a group that has everyone but this one individual in it. Have this group have access to all the different folders. But, on the one particular folder, grant access to this individual.
-
Urgh! I was so excited to talk about batch file creation. This was a complete let down.
-
If you have the elite toolbar download the elite toolbar remover: http://www.majorgeeks.com/download.php?det=4465 If you are getting popups every minute or so, this may (or may not) be qoologic. If so, what is your OS?
-
For more info, check out the "comprehensive" official FAQ at: http://www.adobe.com/aboutadobe/invrelations/pdfs/AdobeMacromediaFAQ.pdf Some very interesting reading here.
-
Machine Check: Regs in event viewer on boot
theefool replied to Curley_Boy's topic in Customization & Tweaking
Also, read the following: Machine Check Architecture (MCA) is an internal architecture subsystem which detects and captures errors (i.e. faults) occurring within the microprocessor's logic. This info was found through an intel site. So, I can only guess that both intel and amd have this feature, which the os reads. Perhaps that app popup just signifies that everything is good. Does this happen on intel processors? I just now checked for this even on two machines here at work. Neither have this event in event viewer. I've also checked this on an Athlon xp, sempron, amd 64 and amd 64(sempron). All of these computers show this popup. Does MS correctly read the MC from intel cpus and not from amd? Or does windows mininterpret amd's version of the machine check. Yes, this is also related to the linux world. Well, atleast now we know how to disable this "feature" in windows. -
Machine Check: Regs in event viewer on boot
theefool replied to Curley_Boy's topic in Customization & Tweaking
Interesting, I'll need to try this out. Also, some further info found out Jsifaq, which relates to something very similar. http://www.jsifaq.com/subd/tip1600/rh1648.htm The Pentium and Pentium Pro processors provide a mechanism to detect and to report hardware-related problems such as memory parity errors and cache errors. To signal a hardware error, the processor signals the detection of a machine check error by generating a machine check exception (Interrupt 18). Windows NT simply reports the fact that the error occurred and displays parameters that you can use to decode the exception. Contact your hardware vendor or processor manufacturer for information regarding the Machine Check Architecture or consult the Intel Pentium Pro Family Developer's Manual - Volume 3: Operating System Writer's Manual. Just some interesting reading. -
Does your computer have the correct date and time setup?
-
installing my Gateway OS on a non-Gateway computer
theefool replied to xellex1289's topic in Customization & Tweaking
Actually, there is a workaround. But, since I did this years and years ago as a test, I can't really remember the steps. But, I believe you have to copy the files directly to your hdd, and modify a few files. Once again, I can't remember the details. -
Machine Check: Regs in event viewer on boot
theefool replied to Curley_Boy's topic in Customization & Tweaking
Hmmm, how can you disagree with something that I said I THINK i may have 1 outta 2 correct. I really don't know. I tend to just ignore the errors. -
Latest NVIDIA drivers - no more Override Refresh Rate?
theefool replied to Phalanx-Imawano's topic in Hardware
TSR = The Strategic Review (I beiieve)....anyway WOTC (Wizards of the Coast bought them out awhile ago.... Hmmm, I guess I am a die hard pen/paper/dice RPGr. In fact here I am 31 and I still play those games, practically every weekend, and a few days in the week...... Or atleast I try.... -
Latest NVIDIA drivers - no more Override Refresh Rate?
theefool replied to Phalanx-Imawano's topic in Hardware
Woah! I haven't heard the term TSR (no not that DnD company) in so long...... Brings back some pleasant frustrating memories... -
Machine Check: Regs in event viewer on boot
theefool replied to Curley_Boy's topic in Customization & Tweaking
My thoughts are: This happens with AMD only. This happens with VIA chipsets only. I think I have 1 outta 2 correct here. Perhaps a two outta two?