p0rnflake

I've got a strange problem with an IPsec based VPN tunnel. In one end the tunnel is terminated in a Zywall 10 which has a NT4 network behind it. The remote end of the tunnel is terminated in a Zywall 1 which has a single WinXP Pro client. I can ping through the tunnel in both direction, and I can connect The WinXP PC Lotus Notes client to the Lotus Server on the NT4 network. BUT - I'm completely unable to view any shares on the NT4 network from the Remote WinXP client. It works just fine the other way - as in I'm able to view shares on the WinXP client from PC's on the NT4 network.. Unfortunately I need to make shares on the NT4 network reachable from the remote WinXP client - any ideas on what is wrong ???? I should mention That the Zywall 10 is not the default gateway on the NT4 network - but I've added a static route to the server that needs to be reachable.

NoAds is pretty sweet - find the homepage via google

Does winXP solve the Via 686B issues ??

I was wondering how well 2 100Mbit LAN's connected with each other through a 1000Mbit optic fibre cable, use the bandwitdh of the optic cable. If each LAN is connected to the optic cable via a switch that supports a 1000Mbit connection - will this solution be any better than by connecting the 2 LAN with STP cable ?? Hope you get the picture... ------------------ The box said "requires Win NT 4 or better" so I installed Linux.

This only applies to regular modems right ? ------------------ The box said "requires Win NT 4 or better" so I installed Linux.

I was wondering if it's possible to use 2 cable modems with the same PC (running w2k). And thereby getting 2xbandwidth ?? The modem in question is the SurfBoard 3100 - Splitting the coaxial cable should be easy enough - and by adding an extra network card it should be possible to connect both modems to the PC - but can W2k use'em ?? ------------------ The box said "requires Win NT 4 or better" so I installed Linux.