Jump to content
Compatible Support Forums
Sign in to follow this  
HELLBRINGER

ATA100 HD. But runs like ATA... well 40!

Recommended Posts

HELLBRINGER, why don't you try another benchmarking program? Sandra is not considered a very reliable or accurate benchmark for hard drives. You could try HD Tach for a quick and easy test to see whether your transfer rates, access times and burst rates are in line with what you expect. Get it from:

 

http://www.tcdlabs.com

 

The shareware version only works on Windows 9x OSes, but it should at least verify if there really is a problem with the hard drive or not.

Share this post


Link to post

This is what it says... I had to load in in WinME though. :-(

 

It is a bit higher, but I still dont think my drive is running ATA100 though. The WD utility wont give me the option. The only thing there is 33.

 

Here is a pic so that you can see.

 

hdtach.jpg

Share this post


Link to post

I apologize for my too sarcastic remarks...

I guess it was my mood that was responsible.

I do understand how frustrating it is, having something that does not work as it should be. I am sorry I do not have anything else to offer you that is it. I am out of idea's.

(BTW you would not hear an IT Consultant say that ever)

 

But I know this, your heat sink's will not effect the performance.

 

Just a thought that occurred to me now when I saw your desktop.

try disabling or closing all the tray icon's especially NAV to be disabled.

Than shut down some of CPU intensive programs etc in the background. Disable Smart Monitoring and try again....

 

PS. The reason I repeated them was basically i thought you have not tryed them. Sorry!

Share this post


Link to post

Just a thought:

If this problem is ever solved we should celebrate! since we are all pretty far away and going down the local for a pint is out of the question. I suggest an online party.

Everybody writes a message while drinking beer.

 

And I just noticed how lame it sounds smile

Well I just woke up what do you want from me!

Share this post


Link to post

what you want to look at is your uncached read and write speeds they tell the real story,if you are getting 40 to 50 meg a second i'd be surprised,also the os has some to do with but it is mostly harware related . and no hardrive will ever perform at the speced speed.ata33,66,100 are all theoretical burst speeds,maximum for a given second or so,like within an apps first nanosecond of launching.

Share this post


Link to post

I have the exact same hard drive (Western Digital WD400BB-00AUA1)

and it runs flawlessly for me at ATA100. First off, here's my

system:

 

900 Mhz Thunderbird

MSI K7T Turbo (which uses the VIA 686b southbridge)

GeForce 2 MX400

SBLive

aforementioned hard drive

Creative 12x DVD-ROM

generic 56x CD-ROM

Creative 6432 CD-RW

Windows 2000 Professional

Debian GNU/Linux

 

And another data point, previously I had a K7T Pro (686a) and a

Promise Ultra100 20267 IDE Controller, which the hard drive also ran

flawlessly on.

 

I know that you have checked a lot of things trying to get this to

work, but I'd like to throw a checklist at you again, since you

haven't solved your problem yet, and hopefully we can find your

problem.

 

1. Make sure you are using an ATA66 80-wire IDE cable. One of

the connectors will be blue, and the ribbon itself will have smaller

wires in it.

2. When your computer boots, what does it say on the second

BIOS screen? The one that has everything listed in a table and gets

scrolled off the screen by Windows loading is the one I am

referencing. Mine lists my drive like so:

 

Primary Master: LBA,ATA100,UDMA5

 

3. Check your BIOS settings. The ones in particular that

matter are in Integrated Peripherals and are:

 

Primary Master PIO

Primary Master UDMA

 

These should both be set to AUTO.

 

4. Make sure you have the latest BIOS for your motherboard.

 

5. Check your Windows drivers. You will probably want the

latest VIA 4in1 drivers, 4.32. In Win2k, under Device Manager, VIA

Bus Master IDE Controller, the version number for viaide.sys is

5.0.2195.5110. Offhand I think that's not the newest version, but

there has been 686b ATA100 support for the past 4 or 5 driver

revisions, so as long as you are up to date, you will be ok. The

procedure under WinME is similar.

 

6. Make sure you have Service Pack 2 installed, on Win2k.

There were issues with ATA100 that were fixed in SP1, IIRC. Plus,

there are literally hundreds of things that SP1+2 fix. It's just

a good idea in general.

 

7. Check your settings in Device Manager. Under Primary IDE

Channel->Advanced Settings, it should be set to DMA Mode If

Available, and will register as Ultra DMA Mode on Win2k. (I noticed

XP actually lists the mode number.. much nicer!)

 

That should just about cover everything related to ATA100. I don't

have Sandra installed at the moment, but in HWINFO's benchmarks,

I get 74.50 read burst rate and 16.81 random access mode, which

are the best scores I have had yet. (They have gotten better as

newer VIA IDE drivers have been released)

 

I would also like to point out that ATA100 does not necessarily

equal 100 MB/sec. This is a theoretical maximum, and usually

get bottlenecked by other parts of your system, especially

your PCI bus.

 

Also, I noticed some posters said that you had to run a program from

Western Digital to enable ATA100 mode on the hard drive. I never

ran such a program and my drive has worked at ATA100 from the first

time I plugged it in. I have never even put the WD disk in my floppy

drive! I think I will check it out though, just to see what it says.

But I didn't have to do a thing to get it to work...

 

Anyway, I hope this post helps you out. I'll be checking this thread,

but feel free to mail me at the address in my profile if you have

any other questions about the drive. But it'd probably be best

to keep the discussion here. smile

 

James

Share this post


Link to post

Excellent. I will go check everything again and report back.

 

Thank you guys for responding. I do appreciate it.

 

And Uykucu, it's ok. I understand where you are coming from and where the other guy was coming from also. We will get this figured out hopefully. If not, WD will be getting a nice call... Or actually. I think I will take it back to Circuit City where I bought it from and deal with them first to see if I can trade it in for a new one.

 

Who knows... it may be my motherboard. I have still yet to get my friends comp to test it out since he has nearly the exact same sys config as me. We have just been so busy lately working, and out website. Which you should check out some time, I want some hits anyway. Who doesnt right?

Share this post


Link to post

Ok here are the results. I feel dissapointed. :-( I will do a WinME test here in a few...

 

Hard Drive

 

I also put in other sys benches, in case anyone wants to compare or sees a problem.

 

CPU

 

RAM

 

Network

 

Ok... I will post the stuff for jcurbo here in a sec...

Share this post


Link to post

Ok here we go...

 

Quote:

I have the exact same hard drive (Western Digital WD400BB-00AUA1)

and it runs flawlessly for me at ATA100. First off, here's my

system:

 

900 Mhz Thunderbird

MSI K7T Turbo (which uses the VIA 686b southbridge)

GeForce 2 MX400

SBLive

aforementioned hard drive

Creative 12x DVD-ROM

generic 56x CD-ROM

Creative 6432 CD-RW

Windows 2000 Professional

Debian GNU/Linux

 

And another data point, previously I had a K7T Pro (686a) and a

Promise Ultra100 20267 IDE Controller, which the hard drive also ran

flawlessly on.

 

I know that you have checked a lot of things trying to get this to

work, but I'd like to throw a checklist at you again, since you

haven't solved your problem yet, and hopefully we can find your

problem.

 

1. Make sure you are using an ATA66 80-wire IDE cable. One of

the connectors will be blue, and the ribbon itself will have smaller

wires in it.

 

-------------------------------------------------------------

I CHECKED THE CABLE... IT IS AN ATA100... 80 WIRE IDE CABLE. THE CONNECTOR TO THE MOTHERBOARD IS BLUE. THE RIBBON HAS SMALLER CABLES. I KNOW ITS A ATA-100 CABLE.

-------------------------------------------------------------

 

2. When your computer boots, what does it say on the second

BIOS screen? The one that has everything listed in a table and gets

scrolled off the screen by Windows loading is the one I am

referencing. Mine lists my drive like so:

 

Primary Master: LBA,ATA100,UDMA5

 

-------------------------------------------------------------

I CHECKED ALL OF THAT... IT READS LBA,ATA 100, 40022MB. BUT IT DOES NOT SAY UDMA 5 AND I CAN NOT FIGURE OUT HOW TO GET IT TO SAY THAT! I TRIED A FEW THINGS AND I CANNOT GET IT TO SAY UDMA 5. SO HOW DO I KNOW ITS USING UDMA 5???

-------------------------------------------------------------

 

3. Check your BIOS settings. The ones in particular that

matter are in Integrated Peripherals and are:

 

Primary Master PIO

Primary Master UDMA

 

These should both be set to AUTO.

 

-------------------------------------------------------------

THESE ARE BOTH ON AUTO AS SPECIFIED AS PRI SLAVE AND SEC MASTER AND SEC SLAVE.

-------------------------------------------------------------

 

4. Make sure you have the latest BIOS for your motherboard.

 

-------------------------------------------------------------

I HAVE THE ONLY BIOS AVAILIABEL FOR MY BIOS. THE BOARD WAS RELEASED IN FEBURARY OF THIS YEAR AND IS DATED FEBRUARY 19, 2001. THERE IS NO NEW COPY FOR IT THAT I COULD FIND. I CHECKED UNICORE.COM OR WHAT EVER FOR BIOS UPDATES AND TALKED TO AN REP ABOUT IT THERE ARE NONE.

-------------------------------------------------------------

 

5. Check your Windows drivers. You will probably want the

latest VIA 4in1 drivers, 4.32. In Win2k, under Device Manager, VIA

Bus Master IDE Controller, the version number for viaide.sys is

5.0.2195.5110. Offhand I think that's not the newest version, but

there has been 686b ATA100 support for the past 4 or 5 driver

revisions, so as long as you are up to date, you will be ok. The

procedure under WinME is similar.

 

-------------------------------------------------------------

I CHECKED ALL THAT IT DOES SHOW 5.0.2195.5110 EXACTLY.

-------------------------------------------------------------

 

6. Make sure you have Service Pack 2 installed, on Win2k.

There were issues with ATA100 that were fixed in SP1, IIRC. Plus,

there are literally hundreds of things that SP1+2 fix. It's just

a good idea in general.

 

-------------------------------------------------------------

I HAVE SP1 INSTALLED, AND REINSTALLED SP2... AND SOME OTHER UPDATES SEE WHAT FILES I HAVE HERE I HAVE ALL OF THEM INSTALLED...

 

UPDATES I HAVE

-------------------------------------------------------------

 

7. Check your settings in Device Manager. Under Primary IDE

Channel->Advanced Settings, it should be set to DMA Mode If

Available, and will register as Ultra DMA Mode on Win2k. (I noticed

XP actually lists the mode number.. much nicer!)

 

-------------------------------------------------------------

CHECKED THAT AS WELL. IT SAYS ULTRA UDMA MODE AND APPEARS TO BE WORKING FINE. I DO HAVE IT SET TO "DMA MODE IF AVAILABLE"

-------------------------------------------------------------

 

That should just about cover everything related to ATA100. I don't

have Sandra installed at the moment, but in HWINFO's benchmarks,

I get 74.50 read burst rate and 16.81 random access mode, which

are the best scores I have had yet. (They have gotten better as

newer VIA IDE drivers have been released)

 

I would also like to point out that ATA100 does not necessarily

equal 100 MB/sec. This is a theoretical maximum, and usually

get bottlenecked by other parts of your system, especially

your PCI bus.

 

Also, I noticed some posters said that you had to run a program from

Western Digital to enable ATA100 mode on the hard drive. I never

ran such a program and my drive has worked at ATA100 from the first

time I plugged it in. I have never even put the WD disk in my floppy

drive! I think I will check it out though, just to see what it says.

But I didn't have to do a thing to get it to work...

 

Anyway, I hope this post helps you out. I'll be checking this thread,

but feel free to mail me at the address in my profile if you have

any other questions about the drive. But it'd probably be best

to keep the discussion here. smile

 

James

 

-------------------------------------------------------------

-------------------------------------------------------------

I have looked EVERYTHING! I already checked all of this and it had no effect. The utility provided on the WD boot disk still says ATA33 and ATA33 only available and so does the updated version of the software.

 

I wonder if it is not the motherboard it self or damage in the BIOS, the ROM on the hard drive, or a stream of bad IDE cables I have...

 

Anything else I should check? WD is pretty much saying the same things as you guys and I am telling them the same thing I am telling you. They have stopped responding to me as of Wednesday. I think they are sick of hearing from me lol.

Share this post


Link to post

HELLBRINGER, you need to check the Advanced Size Check option in HD Tach. Otherwise, it will only test the first 8GB of your hard drive.

 

Still, looking at your burst speed, you're definitely in ATA100 mode. BTW, what's the model of your WD hard drive?

Share this post


Link to post

yeah but burst speed is jack crap really... i think the regular random reads suck ***... 6MB a sec!? com on! my freekin NETWORK CARD CAN GO FASTER! no wonder network never seems lagged...

 

I still think something is wrong

Share this post


Link to post

Ok...three seperate systems.

 

System #1:

Supermicro P6DBE with dual 700e's @ 933 ATA33 bus

2 IBM 30g 7200rpm ATA 100 drives.

 

Results down the list on Sandra's Disk benchmark are:

30 - 27 - 5 - 27 - 26 - 7

 

System #2

Abit VP6 with dual 600e's @ 900 ATA100 bus

IBM 40g 7200rpm ATA 100 Drive

 

Results down the list on Sandra are:

58 - 37 - 8 - 67 - 31 - 10

 

System #3

MSI 694D with dual 750's @ 750 ATA66 bus

Quantum 26g 5400rpm ATA66

 

Results down the list on Sandra are:

36 - 19 - 5 - 28 - 19 - 5

 

As you can see, my first system has a buffered read of 30Mbytes and my second system has 58.

 

Your results you show of 67 - 23 - 6 - 29 - 24 - 7 show reasonable results, considering that all of my systems are running dual procs. A 67 buffered read is more than twice as fast as my ATA33 bus will transfer, even with an ATA100 drive attached to it.

 

Notice that the random reads on all my systems are 8, 5 and 5 with the ATA33 and ATA66 both being 5? Maybe the type of ATA33, ATA66 or ATA100 doesn't matter for this type of test.

 

I posted this to give you an idea of how "old" technology versus "new" technology in ATA standards compares.

Share this post


Link to post

Yes... But shouldn't it go faster? Or is that average?

 

I am not complaining of speed. I just dont see ATA100 on the WD option leads me to think it is having a problem. But the more I talk to you guys and compare it seems to me it is running just fine...

 

I am just confused... LOL.

Share this post


Link to post

I would definately say you are running at

ATA100, after looking over what you told me

in the earlier post. I got part of what I said

wrong though, I probably caused you some

undue grief wink I was typing it from memory though.

The post-BIOS screen says "LBA,ATA100,40022 MB"

and not "UDMA5" like I said before. That's my

bad wink

 

Also, keep in mind that even ATA66 drives can't

really fill up 66 MB/sec continous data rate.

Burst, yes, maybe. ATA100 scores tend to be

about like the ones everyone else have said

on this thread. Oh, and random access scores

always suck. It takes a long time for the

read/write head to move back and forth across

the platters. The real speed on a hard drive

comes from sequential access, because then

the heads don't have to move and you're using

the 7200 RPM of the drive to move from sector

to sector.

Share this post


Link to post

Yeah I figured that...

 

I still think it's a rip off though. If they say 100, it should be 100. Sorry but I think thats BS. Just my opinion.

Share this post


Link to post

Please sign in to comment

You will be able to leave a comment after signing in



Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  

×