Marktait 0 Posted September 28, 2001 On a home pc, not networked, which is better?? Fat32 or NTFS on this system... --------------------------------- 1.2Ghz@1.32Ghz AMDK7 Athlon Thunderbird 512MB PC133 Hyundai RAM ATX Gigabyte 71XE4 Motherboard 40GB Seagate ATA/100 5400RPM 16x 10x 40x LiteON ReWriter 40x Compaq CDDrive 17" NEC Monitor 64MB Nvidia GeForce 2Mx Ambient 56k V.92Fax Modem Creative 128PCI Soundcard Hauppage WinTV Card with Radio This is because I only want Windows 2000 on...fed up with ME and '98 Thanks! Share this post Link to post
AndyFair 0 Posted September 28, 2001 The downside to NTFS is that there is a slight performance hit compared to FAT32; the upside is that NTFS is more resilient and stable than FAT32, so if your machine does crash, you're much less likely to lose data with NTFS. I also believe (although I may be wrong) that FAT32 is not so suitable for large hard drives as the cluster size increases as the partition size increases. What this means is that you are more likely to have slack space on a hard drive with FAT32 than with NTFS. Personally, I would always go with NTFS; on a modern, speedy PC with fast hard drive, the performance hit is negligible and is a small price to pay for data security. Rgds AndyF Share this post Link to post
Brian Frank 0 Posted September 28, 2001 Hey, Marktait, try not to post the same thing in two different places next time--I know it throws me off. "That makes me angry, and when Dr. Evil gets angry, people DIE!!" Share this post Link to post
