Ron_Jeremy 0 Posted November 1, 2001 I am building my first AMD system & will be choosing a board outfitted with VIA's (I'm already in a panic) KT266a chipset. I was wondering if there's an advantage/disadvantage to using more or fewer RAM slots. What I mean is, would this board perform better using a single 512MB DIMM, or 2x256MB DIMM's? Or is this a dumb friggin' question? My apologies if it is I will be using Win2K/XP, 1600+ chip, & will not be doing any overclocking. Share this post Link to post
Brian Frank 0 Posted November 1, 2001 The only advantage is that you'll use 1 less DIMM slot with a stick of 512 as opposed to 2x256, leaving you with more space to add an extra stick or two later on. That's it. Performance is irrelevent, things being equal. Share this post Link to post
Ultrix 0 Posted November 1, 2001 I agree, performance will be the same. 1 512mb stick will take up one less slot leaving room for expansion. However, it is cheaper to get 2 sticks of 256 than one of 512. So do u want to spend less, or spend more and leave room for upgrades in the future??? Share this post Link to post
pbuckne 0 Posted November 2, 2001 Check out pcboost.com. Ram is middle of the road stuff, but requires a high end system to run it. I saw a stick of 512 PC133 for 32$ Share this post Link to post