bobbinbrisco 0 Posted December 23, 2001 Does anyone know of a free program that can do this? Share this post Link to post
Ron_Jeremy 0 Posted January 8, 2002 http://www.exactaudiocopy.de/index.html It is the best. Share this post Link to post
bobbinbrisco 0 Posted January 9, 2002 thanks, really needed a program like this! this program looks good Share this post Link to post
ThC 129 0 Posted January 10, 2002 yeah EAC and lame are the best way to go when encoding into MP3 Share this post Link to post
danny_t187 0 Posted February 10, 2002 If your having problems with the protection on a WMA file that's keeping you from converting them I would suggest you go to this site http://wind.prohosting.com/danny187 the prog is called unfck.exe it's only 80kb but it can relieve alot of headaches if you know what i mean good luck Share this post Link to post
insaNity 0 Posted February 12, 2002 but don't you lose quality during re-encoding? I find it better to just get a wma codec for your player...nothing wrong with wma Share this post Link to post
parrest 0 Posted February 12, 2002 That only applies to analog mediums such as tape or vinyl copying. Digital information to different compression methods don't vary in sound quality unless you purposely choose a different compression rate. Share this post Link to post
insaNity 0 Posted February 13, 2002 I dont believe you even saving a .jpg twice will lose quality. Share this post Link to post
parrest 0 Posted February 13, 2002 I'm sorry. I thought we were talking about AUDIO and SOUND. Are we including digital photographs and digital video and other vaguely related mediums as well? I was answering the question about encoding/re-encoding and the simple answer is: no...no sound quality loss. Share this post Link to post
insaNity 0 Posted February 13, 2002 no - I was using it as an example I would like to know how it is possible to encode an mp3 with out losing quality as it is a lossy compression, as in wma Share this post Link to post
ThC 129 0 Posted February 13, 2002 Depends really on the encoder, ive seen encoders that lose very little in the encoding process and ive seen other ones, musicmatch for instance that really suck at converting files and not losing quality. It all comes down to the compression logarithm more than anything in the end. Share this post Link to post
insaNity 0 Posted February 13, 2002 you always lose a lot of quality OR get huge files. Share this post Link to post