dave.green1 0 Posted December 20, 2002 Is there any way to configure which services start with each user? Here is an example. I have my account, which is admin. I use it for normal use. I would like to create a gaming account where no services start except RPC, Plug & Play and DHCP client. Is there a way to do this? Thanks guys. Share this post Link to post
Champion_R 0 Posted December 20, 2002 Services are designed to be system-wide so it doesn't matter who logs on or if anyone is logged on, they should always load. Also IMHO, if your system is semi-decent, unloading system services won't yield much of a performence gain. Share this post Link to post
sapiens74 0 Posted December 20, 2002 I disable any uneccesary services, and only the absolute ones that require XP to run. You can set a lot of them to manual to only start when called on. Probably the best bet Share this post Link to post
dave.green1 0 Posted December 20, 2002 Thanks guys....I was pretty sure I couldn't do it, but I figured I'd ask the experts.... Share this post Link to post
quixoticphantom 0 Posted December 20, 2002 Quote: Services are designed to be system-wide so it doesn't matter who logs on or if anyone is logged on, they should always load. Also IMHO, if your system is semi-decent, unloading system services won't yield much of a performence gain. I completely disagree; they always should not be loaded. It's more about security -"Champion_R". The easiest way that I've done this is with a batch file. At www.sysinternals.com -they have a great command-line tool for controlling Services called SC (for XP and Win2k). This nice tool will also pause services (not native from the command line). I have found this tool more useful on Win2k servers, but there is a place for it too on XP systems. Share this post Link to post
quixoticphantom 0 Posted December 20, 2002 Quote: Quote: Services are designed to be system-wide so it doesn't matter who logs on or if anyone is logged on, they should always load. Also IMHO, if your system is semi-decent, unloading system services won't yield much of a performence gain. I completely disagree; they always should not be loaded. It's more about security -"Champion_R". The easiest way that I've done this is with a batch file. At www.sysinternals.com -they have a great command-line tool for controlling Services called SC (for XP and Win2k). This nice tool will also pause services (not native from the command line). I have found this tool more useful on Win2k servers, but there is a place for it too on XP systems. Oops, the tools is not from www.sysinternals.com. It's a MS resources kit tool. Share this post Link to post
DosFreak 2 Posted December 20, 2002 Quote: I completely disagree; they always should not be loaded. It's more about security -"Champion_R". He's not statting that they should always be loaded. He's stating that the services will load the same no matter what user you are using unless you specify a specific user account. By default all NT4/2K/XP services use SYSTEM. Share this post Link to post
mmeyer128 0 Posted December 21, 2002 dave.green1 Actually there is a way to load different services. However, not in the form of different users, rather different hardware profile. Follow this link, http://www.blkviper.com/WinXP/xpprofiles.htm and it will show you exactly how you can do that. That website, http://www.blkviper.com/index.html also has many in depth explanation of all the services. It's a great site. Share this post Link to post
Champion_R 0 Posted December 21, 2002 Quote: I completely disagree; they always should not be loaded. It's more about security -"Champion_R". In this case we were discussing performence not security. Also most of the default services don't pose a security risk as long as common sense is applied. Share this post Link to post
ThC 129 0 Posted December 31, 2002 Follow this link, it is the Deviant PC - Ultimate guide to services. Pretty useful, though before you disable any service a system restore should be done. Quote: Also most of the default services don't pose a security risk as long as common sense is applied. That is not true, i would not call UPnP, and remote registry non-security risks. I know that I would love to have my registry remotely accessed by default. Most users don't even have a clue what services are let alone which ones do what. So performance might be an issue but security is more important to me than 5 extra FPS in Quake 3. Share this post Link to post