hardwarecrazy 0 Posted July 16, 2003 Has anyone tried and tested it out? Should we or shouldn't we install it? Please share your thoughts! Share this post Link to post
akiss 0 Posted July 16, 2003 i have install them @ my home computer.it works ok.but i don't trust them for my company network...i will think about this after 1-2 monthes... Share this post Link to post
Linuxboy00 0 Posted July 16, 2003 I have a copy slipstreamed into my win2k pro cd, and have been using it for weeks now. I've not seen any problem at all with it. Share this post Link to post
biniou 0 Posted July 16, 2003 After installing it, I've had problem with my DSL modem. I scheduled an automatic disconnection, and modem never connected back again.... even after many reboots. I tested it on my other PC also with SP4 : same problem. Tested it on a computer's friend (SP4 and other DSL line), same problem. Tested it under 98, worked fine. Installed a clean 2k SP3, worked fine. I have yet to test it on clean 2k SP4 (slipstreamed CD ready) to see if it really has something to do with SP4. Share this post Link to post
akiss 0 Posted July 16, 2003 also i read that if you install the sp4 an you use 3d studio max .MAKES all you files of 3d max corrupted Share this post Link to post
adamvjackson 0 Posted July 16, 2003 SP4 has seemed to speed several systems up here, noticed also by end users. Share this post Link to post
the_stickman 0 Posted July 16, 2003 I have an Audigy platinum and in Win2k SP3 all was perfect. I do a clean install with SP4 and my 1394 driver will not install...claims the hardware *isn't there*...outside of that annoying issue SP4 screams for me. Share this post Link to post
jimf43 0 Posted July 17, 2003 Quote: also i read that if you install the sp4 an you use 3d studio max .MAKES all you files of 3d max corrupted I believe that certain other Autocad files are affected similarly. Share this post Link to post
adamvjackson 0 Posted July 17, 2003 Microsoft already knows, as does Autodesk. They're working on a solution. Share this post Link to post
duhmez 0 Posted July 17, 2003 moo.dll in mirc, for reporting boxstats, crashes mirc when i run it with Sp4. ghost back to sp3 and it works fine. Share this post Link to post
jimf43 0 Posted July 17, 2003 Quote: Microsoft already knows, as does Autodesk. They're working on a solution. Aren't they always x) . Share this post Link to post
akiss 0 Posted July 17, 2003 Quote: SP4 has seemed to speed several systems up here, noticed also by end users. i have seen this speedup @ my home computer.but @ work the users working on 3dmax maya5 lightwave 7.5 cinema 4d and video editing.so i can't risk my job.... Share this post Link to post
jimf43 0 Posted July 17, 2003 Quote: P.S.=> Still, overall, the speedup folks are noting is an excellent bonus... almost makes me want to run XP vs. 2k (has anyone compared their performance by any chance after this SP4 was applied to 2k?)... apk Yes Adam, I'm running a dual boot with XP & W2K on my main workstation. I find that I'm now spending the majority of my time in XP (by preference). After some tuning ;(, I find it to be a (more) desireable enviornment with no performance hit and better hardware compatability. Share this post Link to post
DS3Circuit 0 Posted July 17, 2003 Dunno how many have seen this from Bink's site, but there appear to be quite a few "quirks" http://www.w2knews.com/anecdotes.htm Think I'm gonna wait a while before pushing to SP4. Good to see you back APK Share this post Link to post
jimf43 0 Posted July 18, 2003 Quote: Adam? LOL... it's cool, typo, right? I hope so... Sorry Alec.... didn't have my hat on straight Quote: I'm running a dual boot with XP & W2K on my main workstation. I find that I'm now spending the majority of my time in XP (by preference). After some tuning ;(, I find it to be a (more) desireable enviornment with no performance hit and better hardware compatability. Quote: So... this is not as quick as XP is based on general "feel" right? That's the type of feedback I am/was waiting on.... thanks for it by the by, I will await the opinions of others as well... Actually the 'speed' is about the same. A little faster boot, a little slower shutdown ;-). But, once some of the more obnoxious M$ features are toned down, the pluses start to outweigh the minuses. A dual boot is probably a good idea, as, it lets you get comfortable with xp. By the way, if I had it to do over again, I wouldn't have installed sp4. I see no improvements, and a lot of potental problems including this Acad thing. Share this post Link to post
jimf43 0 Posted July 18, 2003 Quote: Seems MS "traditionally" does better on the odd numbered service packs... no joke! APK As good a theory as any ;-) . Humm... that means that the next one for XP will be a bomb ! Share this post Link to post