pr-man 1 Posted November 25, 2003 Is nero still the one to beat? I dont like nero 6, seems to be a resource hog Share this post Link to post
DS3Circuit 0 Posted November 25, 2003 still better then roxio my favs are alcohol 120% cdrwin fireburner Share this post Link to post
sapiens74 0 Posted November 25, 2003 I like Roxio for Data, But for ISO and stuff Nero is better. Share this post Link to post
Mr.Guvernment 0 Posted November 25, 2003 i hate adaptec just sue Nero5 then if 6 takes up resrouces - or just dont install all of 6, just install the basics - that is if you bought the ultra edition. fireburner is good - as i recall it onl runs in system memory and u dont even have to install the program. cdrwin i used to always use for bin/cue files, but now i just use nero for everything. Share this post Link to post
jmmijo 1 Posted November 25, 2003 I prefer Nero 6.xx for all my needs, however I've futzed around with Alcohol a bit. @Mr. Gov, I know you meant to say "USE" and not "SUE" but when I read it I just had a good chuckle Share this post Link to post
shassouneh 0 Posted November 28, 2003 Nero all the way. I like all the bells and whistles that come with 6, although I agree that they do come at a hefty price on resources! Share this post Link to post
Copernicus 0 Posted November 30, 2003 Nero 5 is great for me but sometimes it's nessary(sp?) to use Alcohol 120% or FantomCD for hard to copy stuff. Share this post Link to post
Mr.Guvernment 0 Posted November 30, 2003 Quote: I prefer Nero 6.xx for all my needs, however I've futzed around with Alcohol a bit. @Mr. Gov, I know you meant to say "USE" and not "SUE" but when I read it I just had a good chuckle ahahha i just saw that! SUE NERO EVERYONE! Share this post Link to post
ThC 129 0 Posted December 1, 2003 I use Nero for data and audio and A120% for emulation and image burning. Share this post Link to post