news 28 Posted September 2, 2008 Hi all, We have just published our *ATI RV770 architecture analysis* that was unfortunately delayed at launch because of a family emergency - I know we're pretty late to the game on this, but if you could post a link on your site that would be very much appreciated! *Link:* http://www.bit-tech.net/hardware/2008/09/02/ati-radeon-4850-4870-architecture-review/1 *Picture:* http://images.bit-tech.net/content_images/2008/09/ati-radeon-4850-4870-architecture-review/fp_img.jpg *Quote: */One of the biggest improvements has to be anti-aliasing performance -- it's nothing short of incredible and it takes AMD (or ATI of old) back to where it used to be. The Radeons always used to make more efficient use of AA than Nvidia's equivalent products and with the Radeon HD 4800 series, that has made a comeback in style. Obviously there was a fairly low barrier for entry when it came to improving the situation, but AMD has gone well beyond improving it -- the architects have gone from zero to hero almost as quickly as you can say just that. Improving the render backend throughput in certain scenarios was a clever way to improve anti-aliasing performance and I'm sure that GDDR5 has had an influence as well. That's not to say that the Radeon HD 4850 is starved of bandwidth though -- its anti-aliasing performance is better than anything Nvidia has to offer at the moment. The Radeon HD 4870 and 4870 X2, on the other hand, are just in a completely different league. Playing games at high resolution with 8xAA enabled is verging on plausible on a card that costs quite a bit less than £200 (including VAT). And with the Radeon HD 4870 X2, it's almost the default -- at anything less than 1,920 x 1,200 4xAA, there's simply no benefit to owning the card; it's all about cranking the image quality right up in today's games. What's disappointing for me is that AMD sees a future of multiple 'small' GPUs to fill the high end market, when in actual fact we don't want to be greeted with the headaches associated with today's multi-GPU technology -- it just doesn't scale well enough across the board. I'd love to see a bigger chip derived from RV770 with well over 1,000 stream processors because at that point we'd be seeing some rather crazy and consistent performance gains. With that said though, it's very clear that RV770 was all about architectural efficiency and on that front, AMD has really achieved. RV770 caught Nvidia by surprise and it wasn't until the company cut its prices that it became competitive again -- the GTX 260 is an attractive proposition, but it's still a little too expensive for my liking. It needs to be on price parity with the 4870 if it's going to steal back some market share from the big red rose in AMD's lineup./ * *Cheers guys! Tim Smalley www.bit-tech.net Share this post Link to post
