Toby 0 Posted October 14, 2000 My first was a Sinclair ZX Spectrum48K. he he, a calculator got more power now, but I really miss the game Manic Miner // Toby Share this post Link to post
CM 1 Posted October 16, 2000 http://www.vg-network.com/emulist.phtml?emuarchive=spectrumemu Share this post Link to post
FrogMaster 0 Posted October 16, 2000 1985: Amstrad CPC64 Z80 @ 4 MHz 64 K ram Tape drive 4-channel sound OS: Locomotive Basic 1986: Amstrad CPC128 same as above plus: 128 K ram 3 inches floppies OSes: CPM 3.3 or Locomotive Basic Alot of apps, even a C-basic compiler! I already had a mouse and an external 5"1/4 floppy drive hooked to the box. It was a fantastic machine for the time, with alot of add-ons available (serial interface, joysticks, modems, etc.) It was faster than an IBM Pc! Share this post Link to post
INFERNO2000 0 Posted October 16, 2000 Z80 4mhz? Wow. That's what powered the TI-81....scary. How long before we see Athlon 1.4 ghz in calculators? Share this post Link to post
Down8 0 Posted October 18, 2000 20 pages yet? Almost... I think this was at 9 when I first came here. It's no C64, but I still have my 486/66MHz. now if I could just get the damn thing to run something other than Win95. Speaking of Linux , look at this banner that popped up when I entered this forum: I just thought that was kinda funny... -bZj [This message has been edited by Down8 (edited 18 October 2000).] Share this post Link to post
Mugen C 0 Posted October 18, 2000 Hey, see if I can make it to Page 20!! BTW, I am still using my 486/DX4 100 to run the older version of redhat linux! And it runs great..never let me down! P.S. The spell checker is giving me the runtime error tonight...It was working this morning! Mugen C ------------------ Dream what you want to dream; go where you want to go; be what you want to be, because you have only one life and one chance to do all the things you want to do! Share this post Link to post
jdulmage 0 Posted October 18, 2000 Quote: Originally posted by INFERNO2000:SPORK! Posted on June 10, 2000. Gotta love that.. Share this post Link to post
DosFreak 2 Posted October 18, 2000 What is the square root of -4? Somebody think of something before this thread dies! Share this post Link to post
Down8 0 Posted October 18, 2000 Damn, I wonder if MathML is supported? We could have some fun with that. We could play 'name that equation' or something. Here's one we can do from last week's midterm: "Statistical studies show that supply and demand for tires in a certain market are approximately given by the following linear supply and demand functions: Q(s)=100+4P Q(d)=1300-2P, where quantities are measured in units of 100 sets of tires and prices in units of 1$. a) Calculate the market clearing price, the market clearing quantity and the price elasticity of demand at the market clearing price. Due to a tax cut the income of consumers in the market increases. show graphically what effect this will have on the market clearing price and quantity (tires are a normal good!)." I'll post the answers later. Now, I should probably study for tomorrow's midterm. -bZj Share this post Link to post
CUViper 0 Posted October 18, 2000 eeeeewww econ.... my guess is $200 for a. I have an idea for b, but i'm too lazy to go draw a picture... [This message has been edited by CUViper (edited 18 October 2000).] Share this post Link to post
Arin 0 Posted October 18, 2000 This topic is weak. We had on on 3dfiles that maxed out around 2000 posts.... Blah. Share this post Link to post
CM 1 Posted October 18, 2000 2000 posts... HAHA... how about 11740 posts... http://www.vbulletin.com/forum/showthread.php?threadid=46 Btw has anyone notice that NT Compatible and 3DFiles was on the same time down yesterday. Share this post Link to post
jdulmage 0 Posted October 18, 2000 this topic is weak? yet, you post here.... whatever.. Share this post Link to post
jdulmage 0 Posted October 18, 2000 may I also add that some of us really do have lives...I notice that the guy repeats "test" about X amount of times....that is just a forum flood, not a forum post...I don't count that has being something worked hard for, we each post something and that's all. We don't sit here and flooding the forum full of messages....obviously 1) That place has no flood control.. 2) It has flood control and they don't have lives 3) Both 1 and 2 Share this post Link to post
CM 1 Posted October 18, 2000 Hmm... traceroute to www.ntcompatible.com (216.247.236.119), 30 hops max, 40 byte packets 1 e-1.4700m-1.3400.yahoo.com (206.132.105.1) 0.973 ms 0.813 ms 0.893 ms 2 gw3-rtr (206.251.17.3) 0.635 ms 0.592 ms 0.817 ms 3 hssi1-0.gw4.sce.yahoo.com (216.115.100.249) 2.575 ms 3.101 ms 2.320 ms 4 peer-geo11.sce.yahoo.com (216.34.143.65) 2.763 ms 2.750 ms 2.400 ms 5 216.34.142.157 (216.34.142.157) 15.177 ms 1.987 ms 2.516 ms 6 dcr03-g7-0.sntc01.exodus.net (216.33.146.33) 1.936 ms 2.183 ms 2.218 ms 7 ibr02-g5-1.sntc01.exodus.net (216.33.147.54) 2.059 ms 2.398 ms 2.862 ms 8 sprint-sntc01.exodus.net (209.185.249.14) 4.098 ms 3.939 ms 3.676 ms 9 sl-bb22-sj-12-0.sprintlink.net (144.232.3.109) 4.278 ms 4.037 ms 4.209 ms 10 sl-bb20-sj-15-0.sprintlink.net (144.232.3.166) 3.954 ms 4.549 ms 3.851 ms 11 sl-bb22-rly-12-0.sprintlink.net (144.232.9.217) 61.576 ms 61.653 ms 60.950 ms 12 sl-bb21-rly-15-0.sprintlink.net (144.232.25.25) 63.678 ms 61.048 ms 61.742 ms 13 sl-bb20-atl-12-0.sprintlink.net (144.232.9.198) 73.961 ms 73.988 ms 75.364 ms 14 sl-bb21-atl-14-0.sprintlink.net (144.232.12.142) 74.489 ms 73.996 ms 74.838 ms 15 sl-gw11-atl-8-0.sprintlink.net (144.232.12.86) 78.488 ms 73.869 ms 74.812 ms 16 sl-il-1-0.sprintlink.net (144.232.194.158) 75.220 ms 74.684 ms 75.242 ms 17 * * * 18 int-5500.interland.net (216.25.127.50) 70.019 ms 76.118 ms 70.019 ms 19 216.247.236.119 (216.247.236.119) 70.013 ms 69.807 ms 71.389 ms traceroute to www.3dfiles.com (216.247.236.67), 30 hops max, 40 byte packets 1 e-1.4700m-1.3400.yahoo.com (206.132.105.1) 0.940 ms 0.954 ms 1.133 ms 2 gw3-rtr (206.251.17.3) 0.937 ms 0.638 ms 0.691 ms 3 hssi1-0.gw4.sce.yahoo.com (216.115.100.249) 2.404 ms 2.285 ms 2.852 ms 4 peer-geo11.sce.yahoo.com (216.34.143.65) 2.637 ms 2.973 ms 2.552 ms 5 216.34.142.157 (216.34.142.157) 2.021 ms 2.605 ms 2.061 ms 6 dcr03-g7-0.sntc01.exodus.net (216.33.146.33) 2.048 ms 1.858 ms 2.387 ms 7 ibr02-g5-1.sntc01.exodus.net (216.33.147.54) 2.777 ms 2.559 ms 3.051 ms 8 sprint-sntc01.exodus.net (209.185.249.14) 3.698 ms 4.394 ms 4.487 ms 9 sl-bb22-sj-12-0.sprintlink.net (144.232.3.109) 3.921 ms 4.369 ms 3.510 ms 10 sl-bb20-sj-15-0.sprintlink.net (144.232.3.166) 3.452 ms 4.213 ms 4.834 ms 11 sl-bb22-rly-12-0.sprintlink.net (144.232.9.217) 61.903 ms 61.959 ms 61.461 ms 12 sl-bb21-rly-15-0.sprintlink.net (144.232.25.25) 62.407 ms 62.038 ms 61.011 ms 13 sl-bb20-atl-12-0.sprintlink.net (144.232.9.198) 75.308 ms 74.664 ms 74.408 ms 14 sl-bb21-atl-14-0.sprintlink.net (144.232.12.142) 74.965 ms 75.014 ms 74.962 ms 15 sl-gw11-atl-8-0.sprintlink.net (144.232.12.86) 74.577 ms 78.653 ms 77.393 ms 16 sl-il-1-0.sprintlink.net (144.232.194.158) 76.229 ms 76.336 ms 74.779 ms 17 * * * 18 int-5500.interland.net (216.25.127.50) 76.873 ms 70.307 ms 70.331 ms 19 216.247.236.67 (216.247.236.67) 70.094 ms 72.181 ms 69.335 ms Share this post Link to post
jdulmage 0 Posted October 18, 2000 see, that ain't flooding, that is giving us information on this site...it's not worthless at all... Share this post Link to post
jdulmage 0 Posted October 18, 2000 Quote: Originally posted by jdulmage:Haven't you noticed that all of the questions asked here are all about Windows 2000 and the errors it has or is given out to people. Some games don't work, hardware doesn't work, BSOD, illegal operations, sudden changes in the OS. Just goes to show that the OS isn't very good. I "was" using Windows 2000 awhile ago and got rid of it because it simply stinks. I rather have better compatibility in return for the odd error or two, then have a stable OS and nothing working right. That's why it's stable, cause they made sure next to nothing works on it, they "babied" it to get it working right. Crappy apps, games and hardware support, but it's stable. Now i like Windows 2000 because of it's features, but if w2k is not going to run programs well then forget it. There was only 1 program, one that i use a lot, called RPGMaker 95. I was done testing all of my games and apps with windows 2000 and discovered they all ran, last proggy on the list was RPG Maker, go to start it, doesn't work. Because of 1 program not running, which happened to be the one i use a lot, i had to uninstall windows 2000 what a ****ing loser.....who would say that about Windows 2000..... PS. I ain't trying to start flaming again, I thought it would be funny for me to point out the bull$hit that I said.... [This message has been edited by jdulmage (edited 19 October 2000).] Share this post Link to post
DosFreak 2 Posted October 19, 2000 heck. If I had that prog I could probably get it to work. Share this post Link to post
jdulmage 0 Posted October 19, 2000 good luck, haha....it can't be done... RPGMaker 2000 is out anyways, so I don't give a damn. Share this post Link to post
