Smaugen 0 Posted April 3, 2000 Hello!!! My system: P2 celeron dual 500 Voodoo 3500 Beta 2 w2k drivers 128 megg ram!! Well, now I have tested w2k up against w98. I realize that W98 still have the best performance in games since Voodoo don't support smp in 3d. I get lower framerates in w2k than I get in w98. This concerns games and benchmarks. I have noticed that the 2d performance is slightly better in w2k compared to w98. Anyone who has experienced anything else may apply a posting here. Please let me know. Thanx Smaugen :-) ------------------ Signing off Smaugen!!! Share this post Link to post
sandvic 0 Posted April 12, 2000 In my case the games I tried look great and perform just fine, however The Sims and Ultima IX run smoother than in Win98 K6-II 450Mhz on QDI Titanium IB+ mb 160 Mb RAM Voodoo3 3000 PCI 13 Gb HD (UDMA2) Share this post Link to post
Damien Green 0 Posted April 12, 2000 You must remember that Windows 2000 is a very young operating system - some call it NT 5 - but there have been many changes since the last version of NT. This also means that the drivers for this system are still pretty much in their infancy, without many of the optimisations that Win98 have baan able to enjoy through a long development program. However, Win 2000 is a far more efficient system, and it's only a matter of time before graphics card drivers catch up with their Win 98 counterparts. Share this post Link to post
Turbo Grunkamoj 0 Posted April 12, 2000 In this case I would like to say: Don't blame win2k, this is entirely because of the drivers from 3dfx. They suck. Thats it and thats that. As an example, my framerate in Q3 dropped about 20fps when changing to win2k. P2-400, 128Mb, V3-3000, Share this post Link to post
DosFreak 2 Posted April 12, 2000 In Quake 3 at 1024X768 with all settings to the max I get the EXACT same frame rate that I do in Build 2499 of Windows ME. This is on a Matrox G400 32mb AGP SH OEM. Share this post Link to post
Damien Green 0 Posted April 13, 2000 I think that DOSFREAk has summed it up - the G400 drivers under win2K are very good (I should know - I'm using them) and there is little difference as he points out between Win 2K and Win ME so I'm afraid you need to wait until 3DFX releases drivers that give your card half decent performance. Share this post Link to post